“Lingering In The Golden Gleam …”*

31 Comments on ““Lingering In The Golden Gleam …”*

  1. I learn so much about plants from your site..wins me bonus points from my wife when I get to point out a plant … fades quickly when she asks me some followup question about it and I quickly move on down the trail ha. Is there a trick to getting “gently nudges”, I either open my eyes to a poodle nose a millimeter from my eyes or Linda whacking me over the head with a pillow.

    Like

    • Every trip is a learning experience it seems.

      The “gentle nudges” may be a euphemism applied just in case someone I know very personally happens to stumble across these pages.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Really enjoyed the photos. Hopefully a longer ride, and no storm, next time.

    Like

  3. I enjoyed the narrative, as always, Wally, and the photos are just wonderful. The formatting of the blog post is not a game changer for me. Beautiful diversity of captures from the sort of place I love to be!

    Like

    • Thank you! I’ve decided to keep the larger image format but have now made each photo “clickable” for higher res pic and ability to zoom in a bit.

      It’s the sort of place we love to be, too!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I never had a load problem and always enjoyed the blog as was. Not everyone takes the time to “click”, I know from personal experience that many just scroll through without seeing the larger image. I post full size and the only difference from clicking through is the lack of distracting other things. I share because I enjoy people seeing what I saw so a larger initial image does the trick. I see that you reverted back to the old way.
    That Anhinga shot, in the soft morning light and with such pleasing detail and lovely pose is a winner. Great shot! Not to dis the others but..just sayin’.

    Like

    • I really appreciate your insight, Steve.

      I had forgotten about that folder at the rear of the filing cabinet market “If it ain’t broke …”. It’s pretty full.

      I appreciate looking at the details in your images as there always seems to be something there I didn’t catch on initial viewing. “… people seeing what I saw.” You expressed it perfectly.

      The Anhinga is not colorful nor is it likely to win any birdy beauty contests, but in the right light it can look pretty good.

      Again, thank you!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Ahhhhhh…. Can you hear my sigh of satisfaction?

    I was astonished by your photo of the lotus-filled — what? Lake? River? Backwater? It looks so very much like a certain bend in a lotus-filled lake at Brazos Bend State Park that if I’d seen the photo without any context, I might have assumed it was Brazos Bend. I do love the lotus: the seedheads as much as the flowers. They always look like shower heads to me.

    The photo of the Little Blue Heron is wonderful. I’ve only seen that stage a few times, but it’s my favorite. The combination of blue and white is just so elegant. The Pickerel weed’s pretty darned elegant, too. The ones I’ve seen have been a much lighter blue; I suppose it’s a combination of factors that vary the colors in those, too.

    As for a better experience, the only thing I can think of is hitting I-10 and heading your direction for a real-time tour with you and Gini!

    Like

    • Customer satisfaction is our goal.

      The lotus blooms are on a reclaimed phosphate mining pit. A couple dozen of these pits were sold to the state over 30 years ago and they designated the area for developing a Fish Management Area. It’s spread over 1500 acres and they’ve done a fair job of re-introducing native fauna. It’s our favorite local spot since it’s only 10 minutes from the house.

      Gini used to be a florist and can’t understand why I don’t harvest all those lovely seedheads for her crafting projects. One day I’ll introduce her to Al the Gate(r)keeper.

      Hope the adventure into changing images hasn’t left a scar.

      Liked by 1 person

      • No scars. I was a little curious about your mention of phosphate mining; that was a new one. I found this site, and got some education. There was one thing that made me laugh. The word/euphemism used for the process of separating phosphate from sand and clay? “Benefication.”

        Like

  6. Like many (most) of your readers, I preferred the older format, never had problems with viewing the photos because they took to long to download.
    I love the feather details in the anhinga’s wings, and the lotus flowers are heavenly.

    Like

  7. I view your blog on a broadband laptop with external second screen. I really, REALLY enjoy being able to click on the images in your blog and see them full-screen. They are stunning! Dew drops, the blue haze (like on plumbs, can’t remember the word) on the lotus leaves, rich saturated colors, lowering sky, all gorgeous. However, I agree with several commenters that the initial 2″x3″ photo display inline with your narrative is not very attractive, and does force a bunch of back-and-forth clicking, which is not so pretty good.

    From my perspective the best solution would be to display the photos initially in the size they used to be, but add the new click-to-enlarge for those of us who enjoy that. My friend Linda Murdock, bird photographer and blogger, was the person who convinced me to shrink my photos from approx 24 megapixel (4000×6000 pix) to around 6 megapixel (2000×3000 pix) for web display. She actually recommended 1500×2000, but I wanted more detail.

    I tried reading your blog on my samsung S10E cell phone (connected to the same broadband) and compared your prior post to this one. The previous post’s images display full screen width, while the current post’s images size to maybe 80% of full screen.

    When testing photo load performance, remember that you need to clear your temporary internet files for each speed test, because the crafty internet re-uses images stored locally from prior page reads (even those when you were working on your post, before you published). Your subsequent tests will almost always come up with blazing speeds, if you don’t clear the history.

    And I do read your narrative. I caught the “leaves of grass” reference (very sneaky of you), and your “woolen steam” was SO perfect.

    With Gini as your guide, you won’t go wrong!

    Like

    • Thank you so much for the detailed feedback, Sam! I may try something akin to your advice and check on the results.

      Everyone’s experience is a little different and I’m probably grasping at straws in an attempt to please all.

      Again, thank you!

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Good news. Julie offered to pop over to complete your regular trim. If you pay her air fare she is offering a senior’s discount that equates to a cost to you of just £7 payable in cash only. She will make the necessary enquiries to ensure that your ESG is compliant. Be aware that she is partial to a nightly G&T and has been trained by an accomplished imbiber of the classic mix.

    The NW skies continue to leak and the wind doth blow as normal. Otherwise we await the arrival of global boiling and the coming of The New World Order. Help!

    Like

  9. Your phrase “leaves of grass” connects to another poet, Walt Whitman, whose main book of poems bears that title. And speaking of poetry, “a blanket made of woolen steam” is quite a piece of iambic tetrameter.

    Regarding the formatting of your posts, I compared the previous one to this one. In the last one, the images are initially larger and don’t allow clicking. In today’s posts, the pictures are initially pretty small; when clicked, they open to much larger versions, perhaps even the full-size originals. It depends how much detail you want people to see. A middle course would be to follow the new approach except that when a small image is clicked it enlarges to the size of images in your previous posts, or perhaps somewhat larger, but not to the very large size that some commenters have said takes a long while to load. I have broadband and I found that a few of the large-size versions loaded in stages from the top down.

    Like

    • I wouldn’t presume a connection to one of America’s premier poets. Although I “may” have subconsciously used his title …..

      Thank you for the feedback on the formatting. The jury is still out, but they are getting testy.

      Like

  10. I only use the big screen to read blogs (and I do read rather than just look at the photos). Your old system works better for me too, but for those who depend on their phones this might be a better option.
    Thank you and Gini both for sharing some of the wonders (and joy) that nature gives us.

    Like

  11. Sorry, Wally, but I have to echo the previous comments. My reaction before going to the ‘comments’ section was that it disrupted and detracted from the flow of reading the post. It wouldn’t be so difficult if, like on Blogger for example, it was possible to read through the post and then go to a section where you can just look at the photos in full-frame, one after another, without having to go back and forth continually.

    I now realise that I have not actually taken in much of your post, but I did notice that your your Anhinga image, when viewed full screen, revealed an exceptionally wonderful photo.

    I shall go back and try again.

    Best wishes to you and Gini – – – Richard

    Like

    • Don’t be sorry, Richard! We try new things to see if they’re better. Sometimes, they are not!

      We’ll continue to consider the best options for all concerned. Then, Gini will tell me what to do. 🙂

      Like

  12. Hmmm prefer full size images, that’s what a photo blog is all about but hey this is your blog Wally do with it as you think best, still a great read!

    Like

  13. I have to say, I really don’t like your new format. I never had a problem in the past with load times. Now, the photos are so small that I have to ‘click to enlarge’ and each enlargement takes what seems like for…ev…er to load. I’ll come back and look at the images when I have more time. (Note: I always look at posts, leave comments, and such on my PC with a broadband connection. I never use a phone, so it may be that these small images are better for those committed to the small screen.)

    Like

    • And having to click back and forth of necessity seems disruptive. It breaks the narrative that’s such an important part of your blog. I know. Picky!

      Like

    • One of the reasons for changing was some apparently had a problem with load times with the larger images embedded in the post.

      I’ve just tried opening, closing and re-opening four times and when I click to enlarge the process was very quick. Additionally, the enlarged images allow for zooming in. (May not ever be useful for anyone!)

      I’ll let it go for a couple of cycles and see what response we get.

      Thank you so much for pointing out what may cause us to return to the tried and true.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to shoreacres Cancel reply